Claims ledger

Evidence

Every claim this site makes, with its label and what backs it. A tested claim names a test in the repository; the test suite fails if that test is missing. A label changes only when linked evidence exists.

tested 47proposed 10 · Download claims.v1.json

IDClaimLabelEvidence
C-01The gate returns EXECUTE only when every check is PASS.testedtests/gate.test.ts
“EXECUTE only when every check passes”
C-02Missing inputs produce UNMEASURABLE or UNAVAILABLE, never PASS.testedtests/gate.test.ts
“missing inputs are never PASS”
C-03Each synthetic example produces its recorded outcome and reason codes.testedtests/gate.test.ts
“examples reproduce expected determinations”
C-04A determination recomputes to the same digest and receipt (self-replay, not independent replay).testedtests/gate.test.ts
“self-replay matches”
C-05A reassessment references the prior receipt and leaves the prior determination unchanged.testedtests/gate.test.ts
“reassessment links prior receipt”
C-06Every archetype a class names has a registry entry and a detector.testedtests/appraisal.test.ts
“every class archetype has a detector”
C-07The appraisal output contains no score, price, premium or rating.testedtests/appraisal.test.ts
“appraisal has no score fields”
C-08Classes, archetypes and examples validate against their published JSON Schemas.testedtests/registry.test.ts
“registry validates against schemas”
C-09Signed receipts verify, and fail verification after tampering.testedtests/signing.test.ts
“signed receipt verifies and detects tampering”
C-10Portfolio concentration and the epistemic IBNR count are computed from determinations.testedtests/portfolio.test.ts
“portfolio reports shared nodes and IBNR”
C-16The study answer key is generated from the gate's checks and matches the hash recorded in the preregistration.testedtests/study.test.ts
“published answer key matches the gate”
C-17Threshold checks report headroom to their declared limit, measured from the worst end of any declared range.testedtests/headroom.test.ts
“threshold checks report headroom from the worst end of the range”
C-18A declared range that straddles a limit is UNMEASURABLE, never PASS.testedtests/headroom.test.ts
“a range straddling a limit is UNMEASURABLE, never PASS”
C-19Each threshold check states the value at which its result would flip, and that value does flip it.testedtests/headroom.test.ts
“the flip threshold really flips the check”
C-20Every crossing class declares whether its consequence is bounded, and the conditions export carries it.testedtests/headroom.test.ts
“every class declares its consequence bound, and exports carry it”
C-22When several passing checks tie for least headroom, the appraisal lists all of them rather than picking one.testedtests/headroom.test.ts
“appraisal lists every check tied at the nearest limit”
C-23The receipt chain verifies, and detects an edited, removed, reordered or mismatched record when checked against the original records or head hash.testedtests/recorder.test.ts
“chain verifies and detects tampering”
C-27A chain rewritten with recomputed hashes still verifies on its own; only a head hash kept elsewhere detects it.testedtests/recorder.test.ts
“a recomputed chain is caught only by a head hash kept elsewhere”
C-24The insurer view carries no names, sources or proposal text from any example proposal.testedtests/recorder.test.ts
“insurer view carries no identifying text from the proposal”
C-25An irreversible crossing holds unless its class fails closed, and a fail-silent class never passes.testedtests/recorder.test.ts
“irreversible crossings require a fail-closed class”
C-26A crossing executed before its determination counts as epistemic IBNR even when the determination is EXECUTE.testedtests/recorder.test.ts
“execution before the determination counts as epistemic IBNR even when EXECUTE”
C-28Evidence below a class's minimum tier fails, and evidence without a tier is unmeasurable.testedtests/source-spec.test.ts
“evidence below the class's minimum tier fails, and a missing tier is unmeasurable”
C-29A class that breaks the source's I2 admissibility rules cannot warrant any crossing.testedtests/source-spec.test.ts
“classes that break the source's I2 rules cannot warrant any crossing”
C-30A determination uses only evidence available at its record time, so re-running at an earlier time reconstructs what was known then.testedtests/source-spec.test.ts
“a determination uses only evidence available at its record time”
C-31Late evidence can defeat a crossing's standing while the original determination stays unchanged and still replays.testedtests/source-spec.test.ts
“late evidence defeats the original standing without rewriting it”
C-32Standing changes are labelled PRESERVED, STRENGTHENED, WEAKENED, DEFEATED or NEW with their causes.testedtests/source-spec.test.ts
“standing effects cover revision, weakening and new determinations”
C-33Insurer exports coarsen timestamps to the hour and suppress any class with fewer than k crossings.testedtests/source-spec.test.ts
“insurer exports coarsen time and suppress classes below k”
C-34The evidence tiers, class dimensions and I2 rules match crossing-graph-spec v0.4 as the source intends them for real domains.proposednone yet
C-35The cover scenario validates against its published schema.testedtests/cover.test.ts
“cover scenario validates against its schema”
C-36The cover trigger fires only when reliance, failure before T, a defined loss and a declared causal link are all present; any one missing leaves it NOT_TRIGGERED.testedtests/cover.test.ts
“an insured event needs reliance, failure before T and a defined, attributable loss”
C-37The joined record reports, per stage, how many crossings have observed data; reliance, consequence and loss are observed for one of twelve examples.testedtests/cover.test.ts
“completeness shows the later joins are mostly missing”
C-38Every applicable mutant of each class's warranted example holds for exactly its expected reason.testedtests/cover.test.ts
“every applicable mutant holds for exactly its expected reason”
C-39A joined dataset from configuration through reliance, consequence and loss, collected in real deployments, can support pricing.proposednone yet
C-40Value status and structure status move independently: a pending amount raises the first, an unpathed independent observation raises the second.testedtests/uncertainty.test.ts
“value and structure move independently over the INS-005 timeline”
C-41Structure is untested by default and supported only after a passed structural test; a failed test or an unpathed consequence challenges it.testedtests/uncertainty.test.ts
“an absence of challenges is untested, never supported”
C-42Hidden coupling challenges structure without changing value status.testedtests/uncertainty.test.ts
“hidden coupling challenges structure without touching value status”
C-43The uncertainty pair contains no number and is never collapsed into a single score.testedtests/uncertainty.test.ts
“the pair is never collapsed into a single number”
C-44A triggered cover result carries an explicit structural caveat.testedtests/uncertainty.test.ts
“a triggered cover result carries the structural caveat”
C-45The declared consequence paths of each class contain the consequences that matter in real deployments.proposednone yet
C-46A published class passes syntactic admission (schema, I2, battery); admission never claims domain validation.testedtests/workspace.test.ts
“admission is syntactic: every published class passes schema, I2 and its battery”
C-47Without a warranted example the battery is reported unavailable, not passed.testedtests/workspace.test.ts
“without a warranted example the battery is unavailable, not passed”
C-48Schema errors and I2 violations are refused, and refusals stay on the workspace record.testedtests/workspace.test.ts
“schema errors and I2 violations are refused, and refusals stay on the record”
C-49A workspace file serialises to stable bytes and every determination replays from the file alone.testedtests/workspace.test.ts
“serialises to stable bytes and replays from the file alone”
C-50Replay fails visibly when class or policy material is missing, or a proposal or chain record is edited.testedtests/workspace.test.ts
“replay needs the class and policy bytes, and any edit is visible”
C-51An evidence pack is byte-for-byte reproducible from its workspace and verifies against its manifest.testedtests/workspace.test.ts
“is byte-for-byte reproducible from the workspace and verifies”
C-52Pack verification reports tampered, missing and extra files and a changed manifest.testedtests/workspace.test.ts
“reports tampered, missing and extra files, and a changed manifest”
C-53No application source calls a network API.testedtests/workspace.test.ts
“no application source calls a network API”
C-54Each science claim reports its own value and structure status; an unexecuted path challenges structure.testedtests/science.test.ts
“each claim reports its own value and structure status”
C-55Disagreeing mappings end UNRESOLVED, and a later convention does not rewrite that outcome.testedtests/science.test.ts
“disagreeing mappings end UNRESOLVED and a later convention does not rewrite that”
C-56No application source calls a network API, and the exported site loads no third-party resource; a browser run of the workflow recorded no requests (docs/LOCAL_FIRST_CHECK.md).testedtests/workspace.test.ts
“no application source calls a network API”
C-57Pilots using the workspace are a viable paid offer.proposednone yet
C-21The declared consequence bounds are correct for real instances of each class.proposednone yet
C-11The ten risk archetypes capture the main forms of epistemic risk in AI-mediated crossings.proposednone yet
C-12Claims professionals reconstruct decisions faster and more accurately from receipts than from ordinary logs.proposedpublic/study/PROTOCOL.md
C-13The crossing is a usable exposure base for AI-mediated decisions.proposednone yet
C-14Epistemic IBNR is a leading indicator of AI-related loss.proposednone yet
C-15The crossing classes reflect real insurer, accounting or model-risk practice.proposednone yet

What "tested" covers here

The tested claims are about the machinery: the gate, appraisal, portfolio, signatures and schemas behave as described on synthetic inputs. None of them says anything about real-world risk. The upstream conformance fixture and its verifiers are documented on Warranted Crossings.

To re-run the tests from a checkout: npm test